Sains Malaysiana 48(4)(2019): 745–755
            
          
              http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2019-4804-06 
                 
          
             
          
          Properties of Fly Ashes from Thermal Power
            Stations in Relation to Use as Soil Amendments
            
          
          (Sifat Abu Cerobong dari Stesen Janakuasa Terma
            yang Berkaitan dengan Kegunaan sebagai Pindaan Tanah)
            
          
          
             
          
          LE VAN THIEN1*, NGO THI TUONG CHAU1, LE THI THAM HONG1, NGUYEN THU TRANG1 & HIROYUKI FUTAMATA2
            
          
          
             
          
          1Vietnam National
            University, University of Science, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam
            
          
          
             
          
          2Research Institute of
            Green Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka,
            422-8529, Japan
            
          
          
             
          
          Diserahkan:
            4 Disember 2017/Diterima: 6 Februari 2019
            
          
          
             
          
          ABSTRACT
            
          
          Recycling fly ashes is a good
            alternative to disposal with the significant economic and environmental
            benefits. Characterization of fly ashes can be helpful to evaluate their use
            potentials. This study aimed to investigate the physical, chemical and
            mineralogical properties of fly ashes from five thermal power stations in
            Northern Vietnam in relation to use as sandy soil amendments. The results
            showed that the fly ashes were dominated by silt-sized and spherical particles
            and had low bulk densities. There was almost not significant difference in the
            surface charges among the fly ashes; however, their surface areas varied widely.
            The fly ashes were alkaline. The electrical conductivity and cation exchange
            capacity in the fly ashes were higher than those in the sandy soil. The
            concentrations of extractable K, P, Ca2+ and Mg2+ in
            the fly ashes were higher compared with the sandy soil. The major matrix
            elements in the fly ashes were Si, Al, and Fe together with significant
            percentages of K, Mg, Ca and Ti. Quartz was the most predominant mineral
            present in the fly ashes. Several radioactive elements were found in the fly
            ashes with very low concentrations. The potential to release trace elements
            from the fly ashes was below the regulatory guidelines. The amendment of fly
            ashes to the sandy soil led to the substantial decrease in the hydraulic
            conductivity but the increase in the plant-available water contents of the
            sandy soil. It is recommended to use the fly ashes as soil amendments for sandy
            soil amelioration.
  
          
          
             
          
          Keywords: Fly ash; sandy soil; soil
            amelioration; soil amendment; thermal power station
            
          
          
             
          
          ABSTRAK
            
          
          Mengitar semula abu cerobong adalah
            alternatif pelupusan yang baik daripada sudut ekonomi dan alam sekitar.
            Pencirian abu cerobong membantu untuk menilai potensi kegunaannya. Kajian ini
            dijalankan untuk mengkaji sifat fizikal, kimia dan mineralogi abu cerobong dari
            lima stesen janakuasa haba di Vietnam Utara yang berkait dengan pemindahan
            tanah berpasir. Keputusan kajian menunjukkan bahawa abu cerobong didominasi
            oleh zarah yang bersaiz kelodak dan sfera dan mempunyai ketumpatan pukal yang
            rendah. Tiada perbezaan yang ketara pada cas permukaan bagi abu cerobong namun
            luas kawasan permukaannya adalah berbeza. Abu cerobong bersifat alkali.
            Kekonduksian elektrik dan kapasiti pertukaran kation abu cerobong lebih tinggi
            berbanding tanah berpasir. Kepekatan K, P, Ca2 + dan
            Mg2 + terekstrak di dalam abu cerobong lebih tinggi
            berbanding tanah berpasir. Unsur matriks utama dalam abu cerobong adalah Si, Al
            dan Fe berserta peratusan besar bagi unsur K, Ca, Mg dan Ti. Kuarza adalah
            mineral pradominan dalam abu cerobong. Beberapa unsur radioaktif ditemui dalam
            abu cerobong dengan kepekatan yang sangat rendah. Potensi untuk melepaskan
            unsur-unsur surih daripada abu cerobong adalah di bawah dasar garis panduan.
            Pindaan abu cerobong ke tanah berpasir membawa kepada penurunan ketara
            kekonduksian hidraulik tetapi peningkatan kandungan air yang terdapat dalam
            tanah berpasir. Adalah disarankan untuk menggunakan abu cerobong sebagai
            pindaan tanah untuk ameliorasi tanah berpasir.
  
          
          
             
          
          Kata kunci: Abu cerobong; ameliorasi tanah; pindaan tanah; stesen
            janakuasa haba; tanah berpasir
            
          
          RUJUKAN
            
          
          Adriano,
            D.C., Page, A.L., Elseewi, A.A., Chang, A.C. & Straughan, I. 1980.
            Utilization and disposal of fly ash and other coal residues in terrestrial
            ecosystems: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 9: 333-344.
  
          
          Ahmaruzzaman,
            M. 2010. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Progress in Energy and
              Combustion Science 36: 327-363.
  
          
          Aitken,
            R.L., Campbell, D.J. & Bell, L.C. 1984. Properties of Australian fly ashes
            relevant to their agronomic utilisation. Australian Journal of Soil Research 22: 443-453.
  
          
          Asokan, P.,
            Saxena, M. & Asolekar, S.R. 2005. Coal combustion residues environmental
            implications and recycling potentials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 43: 239-262.
  
          
          Basu, M.,
            Pande, M., Bhadoria, P.B.S. & Mahapatra, S.C. 2009. Potential fly-ash
            utilization in agriculture: A global review. Progress in Natural Science 19:
            1173-1186.
  
          
              Bhangare, R.C., 
                Tiwari, M., Ajmal, P.Y., Sahu, S.K. & Pandit, G.G. 2014. Distribution 
                of natural radioactivity in coal and combustion residues of thermal 
                power plants. Journal of Radio Analytical and Nuclear Chemistry 
                300: 17-22. 
              Blake, 
                G.R. & Hartge, K.H. 1986. Bulk density. In Methods of 
                Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd ed., Klute, A. (Ed.), Agron. Monogr. 
                9., ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin. pp. 363-375. 
          Campbell,
            D.J., Fox, W.E., Aitken, R.L. & Bell, L.C. 1983. Physical characteristics
            of sand amended with fly ash. Australian Journal of Soil Research 21: 147-154.
  
          
          Cetin, S.
  & Pehlivan, E. 2007. The use of flyash as a low cost, environmentally
            friendly alternative to activated carbon for the removal of heavy metals from
            aqueous solutions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering
              Aspects 298: 83-87.
  
          
          Chang, A.C.,
            Lund, L.J., Page, A.L. & Warneke, J.E. 1977. Physical properties of fly ash
            amended soils. Journal of Environmental Quality 6: 267-270.
  
          
          Chansiriwat,
            W., Tanangteerapong, D. & Wantala, K. 2016. Synthesis of zeolite from coal
            fly ash by hydrothermal method without adding alumina and silica sources:
            Effect of aging temperature and time. Sains Malaysiana 45(11):
            1723-1731.
  
          
          Fediuk, R.S.
  & Yushin, A.M. 2015. The use of fly ash the thermal power plants in the
            construction. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 93:
            012070.
  
          
          Femández-Jiménez,
            A. & Palomo, A. 2005. Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly
            ash cement: A descriptive model. Cement and Concrete Research 35(6):
            1204-1209.
  
          
          Fisher, G.L., Chang, D.P.Y.
  & Brummer, M. 1976. Fly ash collected from electrostatic precipitators:
            Microcrystalline structures and the mystery of the spheres. Science 129:
            553-555.
  
          
          Gangloff, W.J., Ghodrati, M., Sims, J.T. & Vasilas, B.L.
            2000. Impact of fly ash amendment and incorporation method on hydraulic
            properties of a sandy soil. Water, Air & Soil Pollution 119:
            231-245.
  
          
          Ghodrati, M., Sims, J.T.
  & Vasilas, B.L. 1995. Evaluation of fly ash as a soil amendment for the Atlantic
            Coastal Plain: I. Soil hydraulic properties and elemental leaching. Water,
              Air & Soil Pollution 81: 349-361.
  
          
          Hodgson, D.R. &
            Holliday, R. 1966. The agronomic properties of pulverized fuel ash. Chemistry
  & Industry 20: 785-790.
  
          
          Inam, A. 2007. Use of
            flyash in turnip (Brassica rapa L.) cultivation. Pollution Research 26(1):
            39-42.
  
          
          Iyer, R.S. & Scott,
            J.A. 2001. Power station fly ash- A review of value-added utilization outside
            of the construction industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 31(3):
            217-228.
  
          
          Izidoro, J.C., Fungaro,
            D.A., Santos, F.S. & Wang, S. 2012. Characteristics of Brazilian coal fly
            ashes and their synthesized zeolites. Fuel Processing Technology 97:
            38-44.
  
          
          Jala, S. & Goyal, D.
            2006. Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production-A review. Bioresource
              Technology 97: 1136-1147.
  
          
              Kishor, P., Ghosh, A.K. 
                & Kumar, D. 2010. Use of flyash in agriculture: A way to improve 
                soil fertility and its productivity. Asian Journal of Agricultural 
                Research 4(1): 1-14. 
              Klute, A. & Dirksen, 
                C. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. 
                In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd ed., Klute, 
                A. (Ed.), Agron. Monogr. 9., ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin. 
                pp. 687-734. 
          Kolay, P.K. &
            Bhusal, S. 2014. Recovery of hollow spherical particles with two different
            densities from coal fly ash and their characterization. Fuel 117:
            118-124.
  
          
          Ma, X., Zhang, Z. &
            Wang, A. 2016. The transition of fly ash-based geopolymer gels into ordered
            structures and the effect on the compressive strength. Construction and
              Building Materials 104: 25-33.
  
          
          Nizar, I.K., Mustafa, Al
            Bakri., A.M., Rafiza, A.R., Kamarudin, H., Alida, A. & Zarina, Y. 2014.
            Study on physical and chemical properties of fly ash from different area in
            Malaysia. Key Engineering Materials 594-595: 985-989.
  
          
          Okoye, F.N.,
            Durgaprasad, J. & Singh, N.B. 2015. Mechanical properties of alkali
            activated fly ash/kaolin based geopolymer concrete. Construction and
              Building Materials 98: 685-691.
  
          
          Onutai, S.,
            Jiemsirilers, S., Thavorniti, P. & Kobayashi, T. 2015. Aluminium hydroxide
            waste based geopolymer composed of fly ash for sustainable cement materials. Construction
              and Building Materials 101: 298-308.
  
          
          Pandey, V.C. &
            Singh, N. 2010. Impact of fly ash incorporation in soil systems. Agriculture,
              Ecosystems & Environment 136: 16-27.
  
          
          Papastefanou, C. 2008.
            Radioactivity of coals and flyashes. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear
              Chemistry 275(1): 29-35.
  
          
          Pathan, S.M., Aylmore,
            L.A.G. & Colmer, T.D. 2003. Properties of several fly ash materials in
            relation to use as soil amendments. Journal of Environmental Quality 32:
            687-693.
  
          
          Pathan, S.M., Aylmore,
            L.A.G. & Colmer, T.D. 2001. Fly ash amendment of sandy soil to improve
            water and nutrient use efficiency in turf culture. Research Journal 9:
            33-39.
  
          
          Ram, L.C. & Masto,
            R.E. 2014. Fly ash for soil amelioration: A review on the influence of ash
            blending with inorganic and organic amendments. Earth-Science Reviews 128:
            52-74.
  
          
          Ram, L.C. & Masto,
            R.E. 2010. An appraisal of the potential use of fly ash for reclaiming coal
            mine spoil. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 603-617.
  
          
          Ram, L.C., Srivastava,
            N.K., Jha, S.K., Sinha, A.K., Masto, R.E. & Selvi, V.A. 2007. Management of
            lignite fly ash for improving soil fertility and crop productivity. Environmental
              Management 40: 438-452.
  
          
          Rashad, A.M. 2015. A
            brief on high-volume Class F fly ash as cement replacement - A guide for Civil
            Engineer. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 4:
            278-306.
  
          
          Skousen, J., Paul
            Ziemkiewicz, Z. & Yang, J.E. 2012. Use of coal combustion by-products in
            mine reclamation: Review of case studies in the USA. Geosystem Engineering 15:
            71-83.
  
          
          Summers, R., Clarke, M.,
            Pope, T. & O’Dea, T. 1998. Western Australian fly ash on sandy soils for
            clover production. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 29:
            2757-2767.
  
          
          Swamy, R.N. &
            Lambert, G.H. 1981. The microstructure of Lytag aggregate. The International
              Journal of Cement Composites and Lightweight Concrete 3(4): 273-282.
  
          
          Taylor, E.M. &
            Schumann, G.E. 1988. Flyash and lime amendment of acidic coal soil to aid
            revegetation. Journal of Environmental Quality 17: 120-124.
  
          
              TCVN 4406-87. Vietnamese 
                Standard on Soil-Method for determination of total of exchange 
                calcium and magnesium. Ministry of Science, Technology and 
                Environment of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.  
                
              TCVN 6498:1999 (ISO 11261:1995). 
                Vietnamese Standard on Soil quality- Determination of total 
                nitrogen: Modified Kjeldahl method. Ministry of Science, 
                Technology and Environment of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 
                 
          TCVN 6642:2000 (ISO
            10694:1995). Vietnamese Standard on Soil Quality: Determination of Organic
              and Total Carbon After Dry Combustion (Elementary Analysis). Ministry of
            Science, Technology and Environment of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
  
          
          TCVN 5256:2009. Vietnamese
            Standard on Soil Quality: Method for Determination of Bio-Available Phosphorus.
            Ministry of Science and Technology of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
  
          
          TCVN 8568:2010. Vietnamese
            Standard on Soil Quality: Method for Determination of Cation Exchange Capacity
            (CEC) by Ammonium Acetate Method. Ministry of Science and Technology of the
            Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
  
          
          TCVN 8662:2011. Vietnamese
            Standard on Soil Quality: Method for Determination of Bio-Available Potassium. Ministry
            of Science and Technology of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
  
          
          TCVN 10302:2014. Vietnamese
            Standard on Activity Admixture Fly Ash for Concrete, Mortar and Cement. Ministry
            of Science and Technology of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
  
          
          Testa, S.M. 1997.
            Laboratory considerations. In The Reuse and Recycling of Contaminated Soil, edited
            by Testa, S.M. New York: Lewis Publishers. pp. 81-101.
  
          
          Ukwattage, N.L.,
            Ranjith, P.G. & Bouazza, M. 2013. The use of coal combustion fly ash as a
            soil amendment in agricultural lands (with comments on its potential to improve
            food security and sequester carbon). Fuel 109: 400-408.
  
          
          USEPA (United States
            Environmental Protection Agency). 1992. Method 1311: Toxicity Characteristic
              Leaching Procedure. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical
              Methods. Publ. SW-846. EPA, Washington, DC.
  
          
          USDA (United States
            Department of Agriculture). 2017. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Science
            Division Staff. Agriculture Handbook No. 18.
  
          
          Yao, Z.T., Ji, X.S., Sarker, P.K., Tang,
            J.H., Ge, L.Q., Xia, M.S. & Xi, Y.Q. 2015. A comprehensive review on the
            applications of coal fly ash. Earth-Science Reviews 141: 105-121.
  
          
          Yao, Z.T., Xia, M.S., Sarker, P.K. & Chen, T. 2014. A
            review of the alumina recovery from coal fly ash, with a focus in China. Fuel 120: 74-85.
  
          
          Zheng, Y.J., Jensen,
            A.D., Windelin, J. & Jensen, F. 2012. Review of technologies for mercury
            removal from flue gas from cement production processes. Progress in Energy
              and Combustion Science 38: 599-629.
  
          
          
             
          
          *Pengarang untuk surat-menyurat; email:
            levanthien@hus.edu.vn